Thursday, June 13, 2024

Book review: Finna by Nino Cipri (LitenVerse #1)

 


 

Finna by Nino Cipri (LitenVerse #1)

103 pages, Paperback Published February , 2020 by Tor.com

Literary awards:Hugo Award Nominee for Best Novella (2021)

Nebula Award Nominee for Best Novella (2020)

Locus Award Nominee for Best Novella (2021)

Lambda Literary Award Nominee for Transgender Fiction (2021)

 

Sometimes a concept is so simple that you just feel silly that you didn’t think of it first. Finna is a book that sure suggests the idea that the author was lost inside an Ikea and it all came to them. This is another fine entry in the Tor Novella series that has not really ever let me down. It is also an example of unique story and Authorial voice that we are lucky enough to get in part because this series allows this big publisher to experiment in a way those of us who read indie publishers are used to. 

 Nino Cipri Is an author I can’t say I am familiar with big this fun little book has my attention and I will check out more by them. 

Published a month before the CoronaVirus Finna is a fun light-hearted SF bizarro tale set in a Swedish Big Box store that is called LitenVärld (Swedish for “small world”), not IKEA. It is totally not IKEA at all. The author absolutely never worked at an IKEA. Maybe they did, or didn’t I would guess they did but I shouldn’t assume. I have been mistaken for writing autobiographically when I wasn’t. Jules and Ava are in the middle of a breakup and avoiding working the same shift at Not-Ikea. So it is uncomfortable when they end up and on the same shift in the labyrinth store. 

 They end up working together to help a woman find her lost Grandmother, and it is bad enough trying to navigate a Not-Ikea but add in wormholes and dimensional portals and you have an adventure.  If that was not enough Jules and Ava end up being confronted by monster furniture with an appetite for humans, a veritable multiplicity of furniture sales associates and while minding their training for their capitalist overlords.

 Perhaps some of the other Not-Ikeas who have mock-up Show rooms. Would you be picking from Edgelord Rockabilly Dorm Room,The Nihilist Bachelor Cube, Parental Basement Dweller, or the Midlife Crisis Mom room...

Thumbs up. I really enjoyed this novella if I wasn't prepping for PKD fest I would probably have given a more thoughtful review. 

 

Wednesday, June 12, 2024

Book Review: Dream Makers The Uncommon Men and Women Who write Science Fiction Vol. 1 by Charles Platt

 


Dream Makers The Uncommon Men and Women Who write Science Fiction Vol. 1 by Charles Platt

 

 Paperback

 Published May 16, 2021 First published November 1, 1980

 Hugo Award Nominee for Best Related Non-Fiction Book (1981)


This was an interesting reading experience, my thoughts and feelings changed greatly from the first couple of chapters to the end. My book collection about the history of Science Fiction seemed incomplete considering that I often see references to the interviews in this book.  I expected an experience like Stanley Wiater’s Dark Dreamers and Dark Visions with transcripts of interviews. First, I was bummed and annoyed that Charles Platt was often making these profiles about himself, and his experience doing these interviews.

 

When I read the Issac Asimov interview that opened the book, the profile annoyed me, and I felt I didn’t learn anything about an author I already knew much about. I like that Platt in the historical context section was brutally honest about Asimov being a sexist prick. It is also Ironic as this has zero women (profiled alone) Kate Wilhelm is there but she is with her husband Damon Knight) and Platt blames Leguin for turning him and down and makes some weak excuses.

 

Leigh Brackett? Andre Norton? Joanna Russ? Judith Merril, There were plenty he could have reached out to. It is a glaring weakness of the book.

 

Eventually, when I got used to the opinionated style of the profiles, I started to see the value in Platt’s painting the picture of the homes, and how the interviews went down. In my position as host of The Dickheads podcast and Dick scholarship I don’t say this lightly - some of the quotes in the PKD interview are some of the best I have seen. Better than most of the biographers. He is brutally frank about his VALIS experience in a way I liked.

 

This new edition comes with an important addition. Historical context, in 2021 Platt added up-to-date information. Many of these were worth getting the book altogether, with decades of reflection Platt adds tons of value. 

 

Dream Makers is a classic for a reason. Its flaws are serious but it appears the most major one he fixed in the second volume. I think for diehards interested in the history of Science Fiction this is a must-have volume. Now I feel I NEED the second one. I would love to have Platt on the podcast, So we’ll see. 

 

Interviews with: Philip K. Dick; (GREAT!) J. G. Ballard (Excellent); Michael Moorcock (meh); Isaac Asimov;(bad) Frank Herbert (so off-topic); Thomas M. Disch(insightful;) E. C. Tubb(he was new to me, so cool); Damon Knight; Kate Wilhelm; Ian Watson; John Brunner (Excellent); Gregory Benford; Robert Silverberg; Brian W. Aldiss; Robert Sheckley; Kurt Vonnegut; Hank Stine(Was this left out of the new edition?); Norman Spinrad (not my favorite Spinrad interview but interesting); Frederik Pohl; Samuel R. Delany; Barry N. Malzberg (Damn Barry was Grumpy then!) ; Edward Bryant; C. M. Kornbluth; Algis Budrys; Philip Jose Farmer; A. E. van Vogt; Harlan Ellison; and Ray Bradbury. 

Monday, June 10, 2024

Book Review ( A Play?): Kindred blood in Kensington Gore : Philip K. Dick in the afterlife, an imaginary conversation Brian W. Aldiss

 

Kindred blood in Kensington Gore : Philip K. Dick in the afterlife, an imaginary conversation Brian W. Aldiss

 25 pages, Paperback
Published January, 1992 by Avernus Creative Media

Brian Aldiss is a towering figure in British Science Fiction, he is the type of writer I fear will be lost to time if not for the effort of historians in the field.  For me immortality comes from seeing the name on the spine of cracked and well-used paperbacks, or SF masterworks editions. That is how I kept being introduced to this guy and that is why I was curious. Immortality in the field in reality often comes from Hollywood treatment, and that is the reason Aldiss may be remembered. His novel Frankenstein Unbound was the final major directing project by the late great Roger Corman starring John Hurt in 1990.  The story that will lock him into the canon is the short story Supertoys Last All Summer Long,” which Stanley Kubrick (and eventually Spielberg) developed into A.I. Aldiss is one of the names most associated with mid to late 20th century British SF, while I prefer Brunner or Ballad the Unbound books and Heliconia Season books are epic on a grand scale that is hard to undersell. His novels Non-Stop and Hothouse are also all-timers.

 As a PKD researcher, I was familiar with an often-quoted Brian Aldiss introduction to a 1976 British edition of Martian Time-Slip. This was long before Phil’s genius was as widely acknowledged as it is today, even with his Hugo win Phil did not think highly of himself, so Aldiss giving this novel love was as important to Phil as Stanislaw Lem’s love for UBIK or Thomas Disch writing about Solar Lottery. Aldiss is not your hip-out-there new waver so his love and attention for MTS was more than admiration of a John Brunner or Leguin who was peer in age (if not class) coming from the same town.

 This book, or eh chapbook is essentially a one-act, two-actor play that Aldiss wrote for a gathering of PKD fans who gathered in England ten years after his death. This is an interesting time for this, with the release of Total Recall, the slow building of Blade Runner from bomb to cult classic the genius of PKD was starting to grow. This play had the benefit of being written two years after Lawrence Sutin’s groundbreaking biography but the status of PKD had not fully developed yet.

 Aldiss read it, but as closely as I have read into Phil’s life, I had a hard time not nitpicking some of the details.  The idea is that PKD is a ghost hanging around England and gets into a conversation with a woman who could be his twin sister or perhaps his father. This presumably played by a woman and written in the play as WOMAN gives the whole thing a dream-like quality of shifting reality and perception.

 She says at one point she is Jane and at another time says she is Edgar (Phil’s father). It was odd that she never spoke as Phil’s mother (or his beloved meema) but I realized that Aldiss is trying to use two figures who were voids in Phil’s life. It is interesting to use two void figures in his life to talk about his religious beliefs. 

 Aldiss like many more skeptical PKD fans is trying to process the VALIS period. His favorite novel Martian Time Slip comes from that middle period that produced Three Sigmata so Aldiss and I share a love for that era.  There is some time set early in the play, when Phil, talks about being in England and feeling British. Cute way to explain the British voices reading this play. This is the least interesting part of the whole thing. Kensington Gore is a place, and the setting is important to Aldiss, but it doesn’t do much for me.

 “I replaced my life with fiction, filled the cracks with fiction like it was rubble into the San Andras fault – high octane fiction, all immovable forces and irresistible objects. Full of synthetic things designed to be at once True and Not-True. White man speak with forked psyche. My elan vital went into my Remington. Which would you rather have, a career or an Ace Paperback? It’s a foregone conclusion. Being published is like being born; it is a secret way of making strangers love you – even strangers like your parents. I invented PKD by being published.”

 It is an interesting notion, because of how much we think of PKD as a still active voice creating literary ripples decades after the stroke that killed Phil. Is Phil Dick the guy that Bill Sarill or Tim Powers hung out with a different being than the literary figure, and if they are not the same, are they related. Aldiss in 1991 was already trying to unpack the relationship that readers have with PKD. and this was long before the industry of films, TV shows, documentaries, books, podcasts, and blogs devoted to the man really exploded.

 It is interesting to have Phil talk about Milton as that was an inspiration for the novel he intended to write next The Owl in the Daylight. I think this play communicates that while Phil talked about VALIS “reprogramming” him, the way he talked about these spiritual forces was a manifestation of how he was trying to fill a certain void lost by these two personal voids. Of course, the more we study Phil’s life as large a figure that his mother was, it was the lack of love and affection she showed that was as powerful a void as the lost sister or mostly absent Father (whom he portrayed so well in the Father-thing)

 This is a lost out of print work. I had to ask a friend to take photos of his copy for me to read. It will cost you a pretty penny to buy it outright, but it is an interesting read. I think Aldiss is adding to the conversation for sure.